Today in the group, someone accidentally asked about this topic. Hunting thought about it, and thought of an analogy that may not be appropriate to help everyone understand this question.
As I said before, many friends who study tangling theory are most likely to confuse the cycle diagram and level. This is also a small hole dug by the tangled teacher. At the beginning, the tangled teacher used the cycle of 1 minute, 5 minutes, and 30 minutes. The daily line is like this The naming level is a continuation of the cycle level of the K-line of everyone's daily software organization, and the purpose may be easier to understand and accept. But I never expected that such a naming level would make a lot of people who take it literally a big pit. Especially now, there are not many people who can earnestly and systematically study entanglement theory. Most of them just hear it and know a little bit of entanglement theory terminology.
Teacher Zeng also wanted to fill in this big hole many times. In class 108, he used the magnification of the microscope as a metaphor many times to correct everyone’s understanding of the level. Teacher Zeng used the multiple of the microscope to compare the size of the level. , the smaller the level, the more details you can see and the higher the accuracy. In fact, this analogy is the same as the cycle diagram, so it is still easy to confuse.
In order to make it easier for everyone to understand the relationship between the level and the cycle diagram, I thought of an analogy that is not necessarily appropriate, but can be easily understood. Let me talk about it here and see if it can help you understand.
The K-line charts we see every day are like a pile of loose sand, and the loose sand is also mixed with some plastic particles, Jin cotton confetti, in short, it is very messy. The period diagram is like a cube mold of different sizes, and the different period K-lines are cubes made by filling these sundries and gravel into molds of different sizes. And the strokes and segments on different periodograms are just like using these cubes to pile up blocks. The size of the pen segment and the pen center that we intuitively see is just like the size of these volumes that we perceive when stacked. The real trend and the level of the center is the weight of this pile of objects.
So, imagine what it would be like to use the volume of an object to estimate its weight.
For a pile of relatively pure sand, it is feasible to use the volume to estimate the weight. As long as you know the weight of a piece of sand, you can calculate the weight based on the volume. That is to say, the density of these squares is evenly distributed, which is the premise of estimating weight by volume. If some squares are filled with lead, and some are filled with cotton, and they look the same on the surface, then it is just like guessing to use the volume to calculate the weight.
Although our K-line will not be as disparate as the density of lead and cotton, it is also messy, and the sand, debris, cotton, and sand lead powder are also unevenly distributed. The size of the center level is like the weight of this pile of groceries. The pen center is like a cube made of big squares. It can only be seen from the shape that there is a pile of things here (there is a center here). If you want to know the pile of things Weight is unreliable based on sight alone. If you are a veteran, you can roughly see the distribution of the pile of things through the shape based on experience, and roughly estimate a weight based on the volume. As for whether this estimate is accurate, no one can guarantee it. Because there may be a layer of cotton on the outside, but a pile of rotten stones inside. Unless you have clairvoyant eyes, you will not be able to determine the level and size of a pen center even if you are a teacher. The K-line organized through cycles naturally hides its internal details, and what we see is only the appearance and volume.
How to know exactly the volume of this pile of things is very simple, just take a scale; how to know the size of a central level, there is no good way, we can only recursively find out its size according to the definition of the level. Some people think that recursion is troublesome, so they can only count according to the pile, just like gambling with stones, it depends on luck and experience. Whether the weight is important or not is another matter. You can still do business without a scale, and you can make money by stacking, but most people who do business still have to go through the scale.
Level is very important to Tanglun, without level, Tanglun will have no soul, and it is impossible to talk about buying and selling points. If you don’t understand the level, you just learned some superficial knowledge, just some tricks. For further understanding of levels, you can refer to the following two articles:
entanglement level thinking
Explain in detail the method of defining the level of entanglement theory
The content of Tanglun is complicated, and its breadth and depth are relatively high. It is suitable for systematic learning, not for hearsay, otherwise it is easy to go crazy, especially for those who are half-full of dissatisfaction, it is easier to lose money after learning Tanglun. Deep internal skills often have simple moves. To apply what you have learned, you must first learn to understand before you can use it flexibly.
To learn entanglement, either you should learn it thoroughly, or you should not learn it. According to hearsay, it is often the blind who feel the elephant and see the leopard in the pipe to piece together the concept. Newbies should first read the full text to establish an overall understanding of entanglement theory; then gradually refine each topic by topic to understand and clarify each difficulty; finally, integrate entanglement theory into their own operations and perfect it in practice Own.
It is not easy to make money in the market, and there is no shortcut to learning theory. Entanglement theory is not the whole of the market. You can still make money without entanglement theory. Entanglement theory only provides a good theoretical reference to establish and improve your own operations. I have indeed learned a lot from entanglement theory, which is also the motivation for me to persist in learning and summarizing entanglement theory, learning, summarizing and sharing. Everyone's understanding may also be very different, so we can only focus on the teacher's articles, and try to understand as close to the teacher's original intention as possible. Others can only be used as a reference, and eventually return to the original text. What is gratifying is that many tangling friends left messages saying that they have deepened their understanding of tangling theory from the articles shared by hunting. Someone even left a message saying that they would pay me to learn tangle theory with me. Lectures are not my strong point, and the study of entanglement theory is a complex system. In addition to theoretical study, it needs a process to integrate into practice. The theory cannot be accelerated, and neither can trading. It takes time to polish and test.
If someone can't figure it out by reading books by himself, and really wants to study entanglement theory systematically, he should be able to get through the theory of entanglement theory in the next year and build his own operating system. It will take time and energy to complete. The content mainly includes theoretical study (108 lessons and various special difficulties), practical integration and experience in formula programming. It lasts for one year and guarantees quality and quantity.
Add
