Why do many people say that those who use naked k to make orders are masters?

Nude K has a large number of loyal fans in the market, and there are many real masters among them, but generally speaking, most of them are fake masters, and most of them are fake naked K. The "pseudo" mentioned here mainly refers to the understanding and operation of "naked". Among the friends who choose naked K first, a large part of them think that naked K responds quickly, but indicators respond slowly; there are also many people who think that indicators are easy to be deceived and will change with the K line, while naked K will not have such disadvantages; Some think that naked K is the most simple and direct, and it is closer to the essence of data; of course, some think that naked K is as powerful as winning a sword with empty hands... There are various reasons!

For example, some people think that the trend line is a naked K analysis technique, so what is the trend line itself? Isn't it also lagging, can't it be used to deceive you? For example, Tanglun, is it a naked K, and what is the line segment, center, and trend structure of the pen? Isn't it also lagging behind? Can't it be used to deceive you? K-line shape, k-line combination, k-line trend shape, is it a naked K, what is the shape, what is the combination, what is the trend shape, isn’t it also lagging, can’t it be used to deceive you...

For example, what is the difference between the moving average and the indicator, and the so-called trend line, pen, line segment, k-line shape, etc. They are all the indicator forms after the K-line is processed, and there is no essential difference! The K-line itself will change at any time during the unfinished process, and the division of the K-line itself is very artificial. It is just a statistical sampling standard. What is true or not. For the price within a certain period of time, four of the prices are selected according to a certain random sampling standard, how much truth is there at all, especially the single k-line that is far away from the whole! When discussing the K line in the whole, the single K is bound to be subject to the historical nature of the whole, and it will also lag behind and be deceived!

Whether the computer software is ready-made or not is not the standard for distinguishing whether it is an indicator. With the development and popularization of computer programs and operating theories, many theoretical indicators that were not in the operating software before are now programmed! Such as trend lines, K-line patterns, winding theory pens, line segments, centers, trends... For example, "Difficult Theory" itself can also achieve non-uniform processing in computer language. For a friend who does not understand the essence of the theory, it will completely understand I think that "Difficulty" is the so-called naked technology, but this is nothing more than bullying those who don't understand or deceiving myself and others!

The so-called deception, if what you believe in does not produce consequences, then why is there no deception? For example, if someone tells you that a star exploded ten billion light years away, so what if you believe it, so what if you don’t believe it? For the general public, its authenticity is indifferent! Once you believe in something and act accordingly, cheating has real meaning, otherwise, cheating or not cheating is of little significance! However, regardless of whether to cheat or not, based on the probability of success or failure, the meaning of cheating is blurred! There are masters of mimicry, discoloration, and camouflage in nature, but their absolute safety cannot be guaranteed, and survival is still a fate of chance under natural selection. However, mimicry, discoloration, and camouflage are inherently so. It does not mean that they have the willingness to deceive subjectively. It depends on what the observed object thinks. I didn't want to see it!

You need to understand: without diamonds, you can’t do porcelain work; you need to understand: tools are for what you can’t! And when you are better at manual than automatic, there is no need to be automatic, everything starts from reality, there is no need to be either one or the other! ​​​​

People say what they say, I heard that someone made money watching naked K-lines, but I don’t know how to watch naked K-lines, and I have found my own way to make money, so I also spread the word that this is a master