Which is of greater significance and simplicity for you: a High Risk-Reward Ratio (RR) or a High Win Rate?

For me, achieving a high Risk-Reward Ratio takes a considerable amount of time and necessitates a lot of patience. It's led to instances where I've experienced substantial losses. This has led me to contemplate whether lowering my RR might result in a significantly improved win rate. What's your experience with this? I'm curious to hear your thoughts.Looking forward to your responses! 🙏🏼
View all 35 answers
Clarence Lytton

High Risk Reward ratio is better because if your win rate is high but you don't manage your Risk reward wisely, you can destroy you account.

Upvote
Comment
Add
See more answers
saifalhilali

I think it's a mix of both

For example 55% win rate with risk to reward 1-1.5 still profitable

And 45% win rate  with risk to reward 1-2 also profitable

14 Upvotes
Comment
Add
fong zi cheng

I would prefer a high risk-reward ratio over a high win rate.

7 Upvotes
Comment
Add
View all 35 answers

About

0

work

0

subscriber

About Us User AgreementPrivacy PolicyRisk DisclosurePartner Program AgreementCommunity Guidelines Help Center Feedback
App Store Android

Risk Disclosure

Trading in financial instruments involves high risks including the risk of losing some, or all, of your investment amount, and may not be suitable for all investors. Any opinions, chats, messages, news, research, analyses, prices, or other information contained on this Website are provided as general market information for educational and entertainment purposes only, and do not constitute investment advice. Opinions, market data, recommendations or any other content is subject to change at any time without notice. Trading.live shall not be liable for any loss or damage which may arise directly or indirectly from use of or reliance on such information.

© 2025 Tradinglive Limited. All Rights Reserved.